Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
Date: 2009-09-20 16:17:34
Message-ID: 1253463454.23353.295.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 19:23 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> It just occurred to me that SQL:2008 ASSERTION might already fit this
> feature. :)

I think I would only be able to enforce very specific types of
assertions that match the template. As I said to Robert, I think I'm
going to use ALTER INDEX for the syntax because it appears to be the
path of least resistance.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-20 16:20:38 Re: generic copy options
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-09-20 16:16:24 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints