Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-09-16 07:17:44
Message-ID: 1253085464.29086.21.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:22 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I don't like using the word "unique" in the description, I think it
> only
> adds to the confusion.

It would emphasize that a unique constraint is a common special case of
the feature.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2009-09-16 08:38:24 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-16 07:14:30 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints