Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-10 10:43:38
Message-ID: 1252579418.9102.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The immediate practical problem is
> that we don't store a typmod for function argument/result types.
> I guess we could look into doing that ...

I think that functionality could also end up being useful for other
types.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-09-10 10:46:41 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-09-10 09:42:11 pgsql: On Windows, when a file is deleted and another process still has