| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Katsuragi Yuta'" <katsuragiy(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "'vignesh C'" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure |
| Date: | 2023-04-03 18:10:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1248604.1680545439@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> Regarding 0001 patch, on second thought, to me, it seems odd to expose
> a function that doesn't have anything to directly do with PostgreSQL
> as a libpq function. The function simply calls poll() on the socket
> with POLLRDHUP if it is supported. While it is certainly convenient to
> have this function, I'm not sure that it fits within the scope of libpq.
> Thought?
Yeah, that does not seem great, partly because the semantics would be
platform-dependent. I don't think we want that to become part of
libpq's API.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-04-03 18:17:19 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-03 18:04:30 | Re: Why enable_hashjoin Completely disables HashJoin |