Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-03 17:56:16
Message-ID: 1246643776.1228.20.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 13:13 -0400:

>
> Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are
> running in the configure output. A quick look shows that of the 45
> members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running
> 2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting. Most of these are
> the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly
> since there are some of them that are already running something newer.

My three S10 are updated. All of them use version 2.5.35 now. S8, S9 is
not yet under my control and they are not migrated yet to new location.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-07-03 18:06:41 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Robert Treat 2009-07-03 17:38:11 Re: single bit integer (TINYINT) revisited for 8.5