Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-02 19:28:56
Message-ID: 1246562936.1364.12.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 11:32 -0400:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Right, this will only affect people doing development or otherwise
> >> building from a CVS pull.
>
> > Of course, that includes the whole buildfarm. We might need to ask some
> > people to upgrade there.
>
> Yes. What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to
> reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes
> red.

Solaris 10 has 2.5.4 version. OpenSolaris already has 2.5.33.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-07-02 19:34:29 Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-02 19:27:33 Re: [PATCH] Psql List Languages