| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gerry Reno <greno(at)verizon(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication |
| Date: | 2009-06-23 09:56:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1245750996.19951.80.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:28 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> The only one that is remotely viable is slony and it is so quirky you
> may as well forget it.
Like what? I agree that Slony-I is not a plug-in-play replication
solution, but I don't agree that it is so quirky.
> The rest are in some stage of decay/abandonment. There is no real
> replication available for postgresql.
There are:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling
IIRC only Slony-II and PGCluster-II is abandoned. PGCluster-I is not
up2date, but the others are being worked on.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-06-23 10:00:06 | Re: Replication |
| Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2009-06-23 09:54:46 | Re: after vacuum analyze, explain still wrong |