Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
Date: 2004-01-22 16:07:27
Message-ID: 12455.1074787647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The GEQO planner module contains six different recombination algorithms,

> considering the recent discussion about REALLY slow query planning by the
> GEQO module, it might be worth testing each one to see which works best
> before lopping them off.

I'm assuming that the original author of the GEQO code already did that
testing ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-01-22 16:32:21 Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-22 15:53:33 Re: Singnals code (not just win32 specific)