Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Date: 2009-06-18 21:36:19
Message-ID: 1245360979.23636.2.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> > Agreed. The core problem is that moderators have to dig through tons of
> > spam/duplicates/cross-posting to do anything meaningful, and they are
> > resigning under that load. Address that core issue; shaming is not
> > going to help anyone.
>
> There is zero spam - we're not talking about list moderation.

I think a decision like this should be left to the moderators. I don't
mind the report.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /D
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-19 17:23:08 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18
Previous Message Guido Barosio 2009-06-18 21:09:39 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16