| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0? |
| Date: | 2015-12-10 14:39:30 |
| Message-ID: | 12446.1449758370@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Postgres requires relatively recent Perl. Version objects appeared in
>> Perl 5.10 and most people would have something newer.
> AFAIK, the minimum requirement for perl is 5.8...
Yeah, that is our stated requirement, and we do have buildfarm members
checking it on the Unix side (eg prairiedog runs 5.8.6). I don't know
if anyone is checking the MSVC-build scripts against an old Perl,
though ... it seems possible that some more-recent constructs have
crept into that pile of perl code without anyone noticing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-12-10 14:41:45 | Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-10 14:38:57 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |