| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby |
| Date: | 2009-05-29 19:45:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1243626331.31613.83.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 21:46 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to
> > remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss.
>
> I feel that you're moving the goalposts. What exactly is the problem it
> was supposed to remove in your opinion?
I feel that you wish to argue this endlessly so that my point is lost
and the threat of data loss that was left exposed is forgotten.
I'm happy that I understand those threats and will advise my clients
accordingly. I've tried to help the community, but in the end, there is
a point where I stop trying to do so. Now, in fact.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-05-29 20:37:47 | Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-05-29 19:41:38 | Re: search_path vs extensions |