Re: What is the right way to deal with a table with rows that are not in a random order?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Douglas Alan <darkwater42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is the right way to deal with a table with rows that are not in a random order?
Date: 2009-05-28 21:52:50
Message-ID: 1243547570.24860.691.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 15:03 -0400, Douglas Alan wrote:

> The application in question is a kind of data warehousing thing (of
> astronomical stars), and there's an ORM in the middle, so it's not
> easy for us to hand-tune how individual queries are specified.
> Instead, we have to structure the database and the indexes so that
> things generally perform well, without having to tweak specific
> queries.

You should look at indexing solutions, or take professional advice on
that.

> Users can specify fairly arbitrary search criteria. All of the
> queries should perform well. By "well", I mean within 10 seconds or
> so.

That's an unrealistic expectation, unfortunately. Fast search requires
some form of preparatory action and without any clue as to what that
should be you cannot guarantee response times.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas Alan 2009-05-28 22:02:30 Re: What is the right way to deal with a table with rows that are not in a random order?
Previous Message Martin Gainty 2009-05-28 20:00:49 Re: What is the right way to deal with a table with rows that are not in a random order?