Re: GUC description cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC description cleanup
Date: 2006-12-03 03:51:57
Message-ID: 12416.1165117917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised version of this patch.

The bgwriter parameter descriptions seem still, well, not good English.
For instance

> ! gettext_noop("Background writer maximum number of LRU pages to flush per round."),

ISTM this would read better as
Maximum number of LRU pages to flush per activity round in the background writer.
or something else that betrays some understanding of English grammar ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-03 04:36:15 Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2006-12-03 03:03:59 Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-12-04 06:14:54 Re: "Compacting" a relation
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-12-02 19:38:46 Re: GUC description cleanup