Re: Buildfarm alarms

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
Date: 2006-09-24 02:12:48
Message-ID: 1241.24.211.165.134.1159063968.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>
> I'm just investigating a problem with beta 1 running on Windows 2K and
> XP, and noticed that neither Snake or Bandicoot have built -HEAD for
> nearly 3 weeks. I'm investigating why and will fix the problem, but it
> strikes me that what would be useful is an alarm email from the server
> to note that a run hasn't been reported for a while would have helped
> spot this earlier. This could be configured with an admin-specified
> maximum number of days between reports to allow for those machines that
> connect far less frequently.
>
> Does that sound feasible to you?
>
>

It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
I'll think about it some more.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-24 02:24:25 Re: Buildfarm alarms
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-09-23 20:12:29 Buildfarm alarms

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-24 02:24:25 Re: Buildfarm alarms
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-09-24 02:12:10 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available