Re: Show dropped users' backends in pg_stat_activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Show dropped users' backends in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2016-04-08 18:47:35
Message-ID: 12394.1460141255@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io> writes:
> 24.03.2016, 18:03, Tom Lane kirjoitti:
>> I concur. Let's put the left join(s) into those views and call it
>> good.

> Added my patch to the 2016-09 commitfest
> (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/601/) as a bug fix as I thought
> not showing all backends in pg_stat_activity is a bug. Any chance to
> get it in 9.6?

I do not think this is a sufficiently high-priority bug to justify
putting it into 9.6 at this point. It's been like this for years and
there's a noticeable lack of any field complaints. Fixing it in the
next release cycle seems fine to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-04-08 18:49:18 Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-08 18:44:14 Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])