From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Show dropped users' backends in pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2016-04-08 18:47:35 |
Message-ID: | 12394.1460141255@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io> writes:
> 24.03.2016, 18:03, Tom Lane kirjoitti:
>> I concur. Let's put the left join(s) into those views and call it
>> good.
> Added my patch to the 2016-09 commitfest
> (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/601/) as a bug fix as I thought
> not showing all backends in pg_stat_activity is a bug. Any chance to
> get it in 9.6?
I do not think this is a sufficiently high-priority bug to justify
putting it into 9.6 at this point. It's been like this for years and
there's a noticeable lack of any field complaints. Fixing it in the
next release cycle seems fine to me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2016-04-08 18:49:18 | Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...]) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-08 18:44:14 | Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...]) |