maintenance_work_mem and autovacuum

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: maintenance_work_mem and autovacuum
Date: 2009-03-26 18:34:53
Message-ID: 1238092493.16568.536.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Why do we have separate parameters for autovacuum and vacuum, except for
maintenance_work_mem?

Should we also have autovacuum_work_mem?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2009-03-26 18:46:31 Re: maintenance_work_mem and autovacuum
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-03-26 18:14:33 Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction