Re: vacuumdb --freeze

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --freeze
Date: 2009-02-19 13:20:02
Message-ID: 1235049602.1420.61.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bruce Momjian píše v čt 19. 02. 2009 v 08:08 -0500:
> > you should use vacuum_freeze_min_age instead. On other side it
> breaks
> > vacuumdb backward compatibility which we did not declare, but it
> could
> > be fine.
>
> How does adding a flag break backward compatibiity?
>

I meant that vacuum_freeze_min_age was introduced in 8.2 and cannot be
used for older database. if you use it you cannot run vacuumdb freeze on
8.1 and older. See Peter's list of backward compatible applications.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-19 13:20:03 Re: vacuumdb --freeze
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-02-19 13:18:56 Re: Allow on/off as input texts for boolean.