| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables |
| Date: | 2009-02-05 23:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1233877092.4500.606.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It'd make more sense to put the effort into developing
> > >> better scheduling control over autovacuum, such as a concept of
> > >> maintenance windows.
> >
> > > We need that as well, not instead of.
> >
> > I disagree; adding every frammish anyone could ever think of is not
> > an overall improvement to the system.
>
> Agreed, let's get this capability out in 8.4 and we can always adust it
> based on user demand.
Oh, I agree to limiting what we do for 8,4, but we need more later.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-05 23:57:30 | Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-02-05 22:57:10 | Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables |