| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Doug Gorley <doug(dot)gorley(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Regexp confusion |
| Date: | 2009-10-10 03:56:28 |
| Message-ID: | 12336.1255146988@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I think the confusion is about what SIMILAR TO supports. ? it doesn't.
Actually, upon looking into SQL:2008, it seems it's supposed to support
? now, and also {m,n} style bounds. Those weren't there in SQL99 ...
I've changed the similar_escape code to not escape ? and {, so that
those things will work now, and to escape ^ and $ instead.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2009-10-10 04:01:50 | Volunteers needed to help staff the PostgreSQL Booth at LISA 2009 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-10 02:38:14 | Re: transaction ID wraparound - should I use 'VACUUM' or 'VACUUM FULL' ? |