Re: A couple of TODO notes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A couple of TODO notes
Date: 2003-10-20 02:12:29
Message-ID: 12333.1066615949@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> o Add SET SCHEMA
>>
>> What is this supposed to do (and how's it different from SET SEARCH_PATH)?

> I believe someone thought it was the SQL standard way of doing it.
> Probably needs to be checked though.

I can find no mention of it in SQL99. Given that the spec regards
schemas and users as nearly the same thing, I'd guess that SET SESSION
AUTHORIZATION is probably what they'd expect to do this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-10-20 02:47:29 Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-20 01:55:54 Re: A couple of TODO notes