| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8) |
| Date: | 2009-01-19 14:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1232375822.2327.81.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:54 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Some refactoring in this area is also required
> because we need to handle two other types of conflict to correctly
> support drop database and drop user, which is now underway.
I've hung the drop database conflict code in dbase_redo().
For drop role, there isn't an rmgr at all, but I can add code in a few
places.
* add XLOG_DBASE_DROP_USER - i.e. add drop user to the Database rmgr
* DropRole() takes an AccessExclusiveLock, so we do write a WAL record
for it. I could add a special case to the Relation rmgr.
* Add a new rmgr (unused slot 7) and have it handle DropRole.
I prefer the last one, but if you think otherwise, please shout.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-01-19 14:39:30 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-19 14:11:14 | Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8) |