Re: Recovery Test Framework

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery Test Framework
Date: 2009-01-12 21:06:54
Message-ID: 1231794414.30598.181.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > However I can say I would be fairly annoyed if everytime I checked
> > hackers I was pulling down 5 megs in various patches.
>
> Oh... really? I thought we were past the day when anyone cared how
> large the attachments were.

IMO the fact that we email patches at all represents a broken system :P
but yes I care how big my attachments are. If -hackers was the only list
I was on, I wouldn't care but it obviously isn't.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-01-12 21:07:28 Re: Recovery Test Framework
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-01-12 21:02:36 Re: Recovery Test Framework