| From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nimesh Satam <nimesh(dot)zedo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "pgreplication-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgreplication-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, nsatam(at)zedo(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Sl_log_1 and sl_log_2 not getting truncated. |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 15:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1231342885.6302.91.camel@bnicholson-desktop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:18 +0530, Nimesh Satam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have recently installed slony and tsrted replication on one of our
> test machines. When we start inserting data in to the replicated
> database, the replication is taking properly. Over a period of time
> the lag increases between the two database.
You should sign up to the Slony list and ask your question there.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koterov | 2009-01-07 18:39:12 | Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel? |
| Previous Message | M. Edward (Ed) Borasky | 2009-01-07 15:35:23 | Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks |