Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Date: 2005-06-09 16:05:45
Message-ID: 12313.1118333145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> --On Donnerstag, Juni 09, 2005 21:05:59 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne
>> Oh yes, you're probably right. Indexes should move though I think?

> Yes, i think so, too.

I don't think you have any choice about that --- I'm pretty sure that
there are places that assume a table's indexes are in the same schema
the table is. Constraints ditto.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2005-06-09 16:20:55 Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-06-09 15:32:05 Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)