Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch
Date: 2008-12-19 11:51:03
Message-ID: 1229687463.4793.515.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:59 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > * corner case behaviour of backendids - bgwriter writes checkpoint WAL
> > records. Has no backendid, but needs a slotid (possibly others)
>
> Why does bgwriter need a slotid? It doesn't run any transactions.
>
> > * slotids are assigned once and never changed, so allowing them to be
> > used as array lookups directly
>
> So are backend ids.

I'm a little hazy, to be sure. I'm pretty sure there was a blocker, but
if I cannot recall it we should assume it doesn't exist.

Where are you going with the thought? Remove slotId from each proc and
then use backendId to identify the recovery proc?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-12-19 11:58:30 Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-19 10:52:42 Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items