Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-19 09:22:12
Message-ID: 1229678532.4793.470.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:04 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On a related but different point: We don't need an interlock between
> > dirty buffers and WAL during recovery because the WAL has already been
> > written.
>
> Assuming the WAL has also been fsync'd.

True, so this will need to change for 8.4 also

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-19 09:38:44 Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-12-19 09:04:25 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code