Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1
Date: 2008-12-08 14:30:58
Message-ID: 1228746658.20796.656.camel@hp_dx2400_1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:04 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> And is the performance impact of that acceptable?

No, but I think we already agreed to change that to a separate lwlock.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-12-08 14:36:37 Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-12-08 14:17:08 Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine