| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: default database creation with initdb |
| Date: | 2005-06-18 13:33:19 |
| Message-ID: | 12287.1119101599@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> + "CREATE DATABASE \"default\";\n",
> + "REVOKE CREATE,TEMPORARY ON DATABASE \"default\" FROM public;\n",
Uh, why the rights revocation? That makes the thing essentially useless
... except to superusers, who will not be affected anyway. I don't
think this is a sane default.
In any case, fixing initdb for this is trivial. I count something north
of 160 other references to template1 in the current sources, scattered
across 60+ files. Every one of those has to be looked at and possibly
changed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-18 13:53:53 | Re: default database creation with initdb |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-06-18 13:27:49 | Re: default database creation with initdb |