Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-11-13 23:53:37
Message-ID: 1226620417.7149.2.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 18:07 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Since Josh's latest parameter model takes a database size as an input,
> perhaps a reasonable way to proceed here is to put the DW model into size
> tiers. Something like this:
>
> DW default_statistics_target:
>
> db size setting
> <1GB 10
> 1GB-10GB 50
> 10GB-100GB 100
> 100GB-1TB 200
> >1TB 400
>
> Going along with my idea that this tool should produce a reasonable result
> with minimal data, I was thinking of making the database size default to
> 10GB if there isn't any input given there. That would give someone who
> specified DW but nothing else a result of 100, which seems a less
> controversial setting.
>

Why are we building wizards for settings that will be configured by
experts? I thought the idea here was:

Simple postgresql.conf wizard

If you are running a DW you are beyond the point of this tool are you
not?

Joshua D. Drake

> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
--

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-13 23:56:57 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Previous Message Benedek László 2008-11-13 23:31:04 Re: pg_dump roles support