Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?
Date: 2008-11-06 22:34:07
Message-ID: 1226010847.1204.46.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > The way the SQL scripts currently work, there is no way to manage what
> > schema the contrib modules get built in *except* to edit the scripts.
>
> Right, that's the intended and documented way to do it.

I believe the intention is a bad one. They should be installed per the
settings of the user installing them. Whether that be through an ALTER
ROLE/USER or PGOPTIONS.

Joshua D. Drake

--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-11-06 22:35:58 Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?
Previous Message Joshua Tolley 2008-11-06 22:33:09 Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets