Re: "unix_socket_directories" should be GUC_LIST_INPUT?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "unix_socket_directories" should be GUC_LIST_INPUT?
Date: 2020-10-23 04:36:17
Message-ID: 122596.1603427777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about adding a comment along the lines of

A comment seems reasonable, but I'd probably write it more like

/*
* unix_socket_directories should have been marked GUC_LIST_INPUT |
* GUC_LIST_QUOTE, but it's too late to change it without creating
* big compatibility problems for pg_dump.
*/

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-10-23 04:46:11 Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2020-10-23 04:21:11 Re: new heapcheck contrib module