| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2015-09-25 17:09:46 |
| Message-ID: | 12259.1443200986@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> On 09/25/2015 09:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not know how much emphasis the project should place on point #2.
>> By definition, fixing that will not return any direct benefit to us.
> I would argue that there is some benefit for us in terms of advocacy. We
> certainly get criticized for our lack of a bug tracker. I don't know of
> anyone who specifically rejected Postgres because of that fact, but
> would not be surprised if has happened.
Yeah. I should have put in something to the effect that there may be
indirect benefits, but they're pretty hard to quantify.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-09-25 17:09:47 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2015-09-25 16:55:56 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |