| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
| Date: | 2008-10-23 03:31:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1224732709.27145.553.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 13:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can't reproduce this 100% reliably, but the case where I saw it came
> from mistakenly inserting
> Assert(!IsA(node, AppendRelInfo));
> into flatten_join_alias_vars_mutator and then running the serial
> regression tests. This case *can* happen, but it doesn't occur
> until late in the regression tests. The recovery ensuing from the
> assert failure crashes maybe one time in two --- likely has something
> to do with when the last checkpoint happened.
This seems like a useful type of test.
Can we change regression tests so that we avoid checkpoints, then crash
at the end of the test and go through recovery process? That would be a
neat way of including a recovery check in with each make check.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-23 03:38:20 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-23 00:24:51 | pgsql: When estimating without benefit of MCV lists (suggesting that one |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-23 03:38:20 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
| Previous Message | Charles Duffy | 2008-10-23 03:10:55 | Making pg_standby compression-friendly |