| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
| Subject: | Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback |
| Date: | 2008-10-22 14:11:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1224684667.27145.311.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree we could do the stream bitmap as well, but I'd suggest we should
> > save that until the rest of the patch has been checked out.
>
> Well, that would be a reasonable implementation path, but it's got
> nothing to do with the patch as presented. The concern was getting
> rid of some massive and ugly hacks in the executor ...
Agreed, no ugly hacks in executor allowed.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-10-22 14:15:15 | SQL:2008 CURRENT_CATALOG and CURRENT_SCHEMA |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-22 14:00:23 | Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback |