From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: simplehash vs. pgindent |
Date: | 2016-12-21 05:32:22 |
Message-ID: | 12238.1482298342@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In commit b30d3ea824c5ccba43d3e942704f20686e7dbab8, when Andres added
> the simplehash stuff, he also added SH_TYPE, SH_ITERATOR, and
> SH_STATUS to typedefs.list. When I subsequently updated typedefs.list
> from the buildfarm in acddbe221b084956a0efd6e4b6c6586e8fd994d7, it of
> course removed those entries since they are merely placeholders for
> real types, not anything that would ever appear in a symbol table. So
> now if you pgindent the simplehash stuff, it does stupid things.
> I think we should add a file src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.extra.list.
> Somehow teach pgindent to search whatever directory it searches for
> typedefs.list for typedefs.extra.list as well. Then we can put stuff
> in there that the buildfarm doesn't find, and pgindent can combine the
> files in load_typedefs(). That way we can still update typedefs.list
> straight from the buildfarm, but there's a place to put manual entries
> that we don't want to lose. We could also teach load_typedefs() to
> strip out lines that are empty or start with #, and then we'd be able
> to put comments in typedefs.extra.list explaining why each entry needs
> to be present there rather than relying on the normal mechanism.
Or we could just fix the code so it doesn't use phony typedefs?
If a typedef is never used as a variable or field type, how much
do we really need it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-12-21 06:06:34 | Re: bigint vs txid user confusion |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-12-21 05:20:47 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |