Re: Parallel safety of contrib extensions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Winfield, Steven" <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety of contrib extensions
Date: 2020-06-10 16:40:54
Message-ID: 12233.1591807254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Winfield, Steven" <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com> writes:
> There was a thread about this back in 2016[1], but I've just been bitten by it and wondered if any (more) extensions, particularly btree_gist, will have their operators/functions verified and marked as parallel-safe?

Whenever somebody does the legwork and sends a patch ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PEDRO PABLO SEVERIN HONORATO 2020-06-10 16:57:53 Re: Help with plpython3u
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-06-10 16:33:42 Re: [HELP] Reset postgres server