| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: warning message in standby |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 14:08:31 |
| Message-ID: | 12232.1276524511@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to
>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or
>> FATAL either...
> My point is that most tools are going to look at the tag first to
> determine the severity of the message, and might even have
> log_min_messages set to ignore warnings.
Why is this discussion based on the idea that we have to cater to
incorrectly written log-filtering apps?
The correct log level for this message is LOG. End of discussion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-14 14:13:12 | Re: warning message in standby |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-14 14:05:44 | Re: pg_dump(all) --quote-all-identifiers |