Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Date: 2017-02-27 17:19:16
Message-ID: 12223.1488215956@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> FWIW I think the ppc64 machines are failing because of unrelated issue
>> (changes to integer timestamps). We should probably look at 32bit machines
>> first.

> Don't think so - termite is ppc64 afaics, and the failure doesn't look
> integer timestamp related (assert failure is clearly about this, and set
> of changed commits *only* include slab related commits).

There are a couple of animals that have --disable-integer-datetimes,
but those are failing at the configure stage, and were doing so
before today.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-02-27 17:27:48 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-02-27 17:04:41 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators