Re: parallel pg_restore

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore
Date: 2008-09-23 21:10:33
Message-ID: 1222204233.4445.470.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:50 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> If we get all that done by November we'll have done well. And we know
> that in some cases just this much can lead to reductions in restore
> time
> of the order of 80%.

Agreed. Go for it.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-09-23 21:13:07 Re: pg_settings.sourcefile patch is a security breach
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-23 20:50:47 Re: EXEC_BACKEND