Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum
Date: 2008-09-10 20:31:46
Message-ID: 1221078706.3913.762.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 16:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If there were a serious performance argument against that, then yeah,
> but I don't see one.

Maybe! Just finishing other patch then I'll be starting Hot Standby
discussions, so we'll see.

Simon Riggs
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-10 21:06:37 Re: [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-10 20:30:10 Re: Potential Join Performance Issue