Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date: 2008-09-10 09:04:39
Message-ID: 1221037479.3913.630.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 17:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:

> I cannot accept that WAL sender is blocked for initial setup.

Yes, very important point. We definitely agree on that. The primary must
be able to continue working while all this setup is happening. No tables
are locked, all commits are allowed etc..

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-09-10 09:07:49 Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2008-09-10 08:57:33 Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication