| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Need more reviewers! |
| Date: | 2008-09-05 11:18:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1220613491.4371.1157.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If you are a postgresql hacker at all, or even want to be one, we need your
> help reviewing patches! There are several "easy" patches in the list, so
> I can assign them to beginners.
It would be a reasonable rule that all patch submitters also have to do
patch reviews. If we made it a strict rule, then sponsoring companies
would know that they *must* provide money/time for that aspect also.
Otherwise it is almost impossible to get formal approval to do that.
I count more than 20 patch authors that are not reviewing, including
myself. Of that, there are at least 5 people on their second or
subsequent patch (figure probably wildly inaccurate, since don't keep
track of that).
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-09-05 11:25:56 | Re: Patch: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-09-05 11:16:08 | Re: Patch: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg |