Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]
Date: 2008-08-26 14:18:21
Message-ID: 1219760301.4126.40.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> The advantages of doing this would be (a) reduce the number of places
> to look in when implementing a new node type; (b) eliminate some
> cross-subsystem #inclusions that weaken modularity of the backend.

Are we doing either of those things in this release?

Might these changes screw up patches already in progress? Can we hold
off making these changes until we're sure the latter isn't true?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2008-08-26 14:31:31 Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2008-08-26 13:59:24 Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server