| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed Resource Manager Changes |
| Date: | 2008-08-20 09:31:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1219224712.5343.1087.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:46 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> One thing to worry about is a confliction of RmgrId. We can check
> conflictions in redo because rmgrs are actually registered, but
> we might need to check conflictions even in a normal running.
> Extensions that write own XLog record can use arbitrary RmgrIds
> without restrictions.
That sounds quite hard. I'm putting in a check on the id itself, which
will be more than we had before...
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-08-20 09:51:14 | Is mdextend really safe? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-08-20 09:28:05 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |