| From: | Mark Roberts <mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com>, justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database? |
| Date: | 2008-08-19 17:01:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1219165290.5967.27.camel@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 07:34 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> In theory, you can have so many disks that the bottleneck moves to
> some
> other location, such as the IO bus or memory or the CPU, but I've
> never
> heard of that happening to anyone. Also, you want to get fast, high-
> quality disks, as 10 15,000 RPM disks are going to perform better than
> 10 7,200 RPM disks.
I've personally experienced this happening.
-Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Roberts | 2008-08-19 17:10:16 | Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database? |
| Previous Message | Alan Hodgson | 2008-08-19 16:42:07 | Re: Updates and deletes with joins |