Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-04-29 22:07:07
Message-ID: 12189.1556575627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Taking this as a WIP, what do you think?

> Seems generally about right.

Andres, are you pushing this forward? Next week's minor releases
are coming up fast, and we're going to need to adapt the HEAD patch
significantly for the back branches AFAICS. So there's little time
to spare.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-04-29 22:09:24 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-04-29 21:29:44 Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples