| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-22 20:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | 12173.1090527593@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> 2) Is is possible to make the recovery kick in even though pg_control
> says the database state is shutdown?
Yeah, I think you are right: presence of recovery.conf should force a
WAL scan even if pg_control claims it's shut down. Fix committed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-22 20:45:03 | Re: how to find transaction associated with a lock |
| Previous Message | Si Chen | 2004-07-22 19:16:38 | how to find transaction associated with a lock |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-22 20:37:23 | Release notes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-22 15:13:12 | Re: [JDBC] V3 protocol + DECLARE problems |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-22 21:46:10 | Re: win32 readline |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-22 19:02:45 | Re: initdb authentication |