| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump |
| Date: | 2008-07-25 18:33:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1217010800.3894.975.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 13:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Attached patch implements WHERE clauses for pg_dump.
>
> I still have serious reservations about adding such an ugly,
> non-orthogonal wart to pg_dump. Why is it not appropriate to just
> do a COPY (SELECT ...) TO STDOUT when you need this?
So you can dump a coherent sample database in one command, not 207.
Every user of PostgreSQL wants a dev/test database. If the database is
large it isn't practical to take a complete copy. Nor is it practical to
hand-write a data sampling extraction program and if you do, its usually
imperfect in many ways.
Adding this feature gives a very fast capability to create sample
databases, or incremental backups for many cases.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-07-25 18:46:28 | Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2008-07-25 17:57:10 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |