Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-07-24 08:56:49
Message-ID: 1216889809.3894.747.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 03:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > [80k patch]
> Surely there is a whole lot of unintended noise in this patch?
> I certainly don't believe that you meant to change keywords.c
> for instance.

Removed, thanks.

Unrelated to this patch, it seems I have some issues with my repository,
judging by this and another unrelated issue reported by Martin Zaun.

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

Attachment: pg_dump_beforeafter.v6.patch
Description: text/x-patch (38.7 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2008-07-24 09:20:45
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous:From: Martin ZaunDate: 2008-07-24 08:30:56
Subject: Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2008-07-24 15:53:56
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-24 07:54:01
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group