Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-07-24 08:56:49
Message-ID: 1216889809.3894.747.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 03:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > [80k patch]
>
> Surely there is a whole lot of unintended noise in this patch?
> I certainly don't believe that you meant to change keywords.c
> for instance.

Removed, thanks.

Unrelated to this patch, it seems I have some issues with my repository,
judging by this and another unrelated issue reported by Martin Zaun.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump_beforeafter.v6.patch text/x-patch 38.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2008-07-24 09:20:45 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous Message Martin Zaun 2008-07-24 08:30:56 Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2008-07-24 15:53:56 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-24 07:54:01 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance